qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PULL 7/7] hw/pci: fix pci_update_mappings() trace ev


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PULL 7/7] hw/pci: fix pci_update_mappings() trace events
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:54:43 +0300

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/10/15 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > From: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> > 
> > The current trace prototypes and (matching) trace calls lead to
> > "unorthodox" PCI BDF notation in at least the stderr trace backend. For
> > example, the four BARs of a QXL video card at 00:01.0 (bus 0, slot 1,
> > function 0) are traced like this (PID and timestamps removed):
> > 
> >   pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 0,0x84000000+0x4000000
> >   pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 1,0x80000000+0x4000000
> >   pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 2,0x88200000+0x2000
> >   pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 3,0xd060+0x20
> > 
> > The slot and function values are in reverse order.
> > 
> > Stick with the conventional BDF notation.
> > 
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Don Koch <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Fixes: 7828d75045
> > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> 
> can you please add Marcel's R-b too? From
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/358561/focus=358673>.
> 
> Also, the patch has been picked up by Michael Tokarev for qemu-trivial,
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/358561/focus=358673>.
> I apologize for the confusion, but I really couldn't figure out myself
> if this should go "only" to trivial, or to PCI "only". I guess the patch
> could be dropped from exactly one of the two queues, but I also expect
> that whenever the chronologically second one is going to be merged, git
> will simply realize that the patch is already present.
> 
> So, my point is that please add *both* R-b tags, regardless of which
> tree this is going to be pulled from first.
> 
> Also: any guidance for the next time I have a trivial patch for PCI?
> Should I Cc qemu-trivial, or not?
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo

I dropped it from the tag, thanks.

I think you did everything right, but [trivial PATCH] confused
my scripts. Better would be [PATCH <anything>].

For pci, best to Cc just me - I can handle trivial patches there with no
problems.


> 
> > ---
> >  hw/pci/pci.c | 4 ++--
> >  trace-events | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > index eba7ca2..ccea628 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -1154,16 +1154,16 @@ static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d)
> >          /* now do the real mapping */
> >          if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) {
> >              trace_pci_update_mappings_del(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus),
> > -                                          PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> >                                            PCI_SLOT(d->devfn),
> > +                                          PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> >                                            i, r->addr, r->size);
> >              memory_region_del_subregion(r->address_space, r->memory);
> >          }
> >          r->addr = new_addr;
> >          if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) {
> >              trace_pci_update_mappings_add(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus),
> > -                                          PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> >                                            PCI_SLOT(d->devfn),
> > +                                          PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> >                                            i, r->addr, r->size);
> >              memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(r->address_space,
> >                                                  r->addr, r->memory, 1);
> > diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> > index 0a82f0c..1684a95 100644
> > --- a/trace-events
> > +++ b/trace-events
> > @@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@ spapr_pci_lsi_set(const char *busname, int pin, 
> > uint32_t irq) "%s PIN%d IRQ %u"
> >  spapr_pci_msi_retry(unsigned config_addr, unsigned req_num, unsigned 
> > max_irqs) "Guest device at %x asked %u, have only %u"
> >  
> >  # hw/pci/pci.c
> > -pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t 
> > slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x 
> > %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64
> > -pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t 
> > slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x 
> > %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64
> > +pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t 
> > func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x 
> > %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64
> > +pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t 
> > func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x 
> > %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64
> >  
> >  # hw/net/pcnet.c
> >  pcnet_s_reset(void *s) "s=%p"
> > 
> 
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]