qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 4/5] tests/i44fx-test: No need for zeroing mem


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 4/5] tests/i44fx-test: No need for zeroing memory before memset
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:24:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 10/08/15 21:35, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Change a g_malloc0 into g_malloc since the following
> memset fills the whole buffer anyway.
> 
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/i440fx-test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i440fx-test.c b/tests/i440fx-test.c
> index d0bc8de..7fa1709 100644
> --- a/tests/i440fx-test.c
> +++ b/tests/i440fx-test.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void write_area(uint32_t start, uint32_t end, 
> uint8_t value)
>      uint32_t size = end - start + 1;
>      uint8_t *data;
>  
> -    data = g_malloc0(size);
> +    data = g_malloc(size);
>      memset(data, value, size);
>      memwrite(start, data, size);
>  
> 

Technically you are right of course, but I remember some historical mess
around this, in this file.

Plus I vaguely recall g_new[0]() being the most recent preference.

https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Memory-Allocation.html#g-new

See e.g. commit 97f3ad3551. Markus?

Thanks
Laszlo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]