[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] crypto/ivgen-essiv: Fix problem with address sani

From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] crypto/ivgen-essiv: Fix problem with address sanitizer of Clang
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:37:45 +0100

When compiling QEMU with clang and -fsanitize=address, I get the
following error:

==9185==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 
0x7ffc7e9adf2f at pc 0x564cba001d88 bp 0x7ffc7e9adeb0 sp 0x7ffc7e9adea8
READ of size 16 at 0x7ffc7e9adf2f thread T0
    #0 0x564cba001d87 in qcrypto_ivgen_essiv_calculate 
    #1 0x564cba001367 in qcrypto_ivgen_calculate .../crypto/ivgen.c:72
    #2 0x564cb9fec630 in test_ivgen .../tests/test-crypto-ivgen.c:148
    #3 0x7f98f4224b39 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6fb39)
    #4 0x7f98f4224d02 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6fd02)
    #5 0x7f98f4224d02 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6fd02)
    #6 0x7f98f4224d02 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6fd02)
    #7 0x7f98f4224f0d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6ff0d)
    #8 0x7f98f4224f30 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6ff30)
    #9 0x564cb9fec446 in main .../tests/test-crypto-ivgen.c:173
    #10 0x7f98f294fc04 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21c04)
    #11 0x564cb9fec1ac in _start (.../tests/test-crypto-ivgen+0xdb1ac)

Address 0x7ffc7e9adf2f is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 47 in frame
    #0 0x564cba00192f in qcrypto_ivgen_essiv_calculate 

And indeed, the code is doing a "memcpy(data, (uint8_t *)&sector, ndata)"
here with "sector" being a uint64_t variable and ndata = 16.

Fix it by limiting the size of the memcpy correctly.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
 crypto/ivgen-essiv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/crypto/ivgen-essiv.c b/crypto/ivgen-essiv.c
index cba20bd..8944609 100644
--- a/crypto/ivgen-essiv.c
+++ b/crypto/ivgen-essiv.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int qcrypto_ivgen_essiv_calculate(QCryptoIVGen *ivgen,
     uint8_t *data = g_new(uint8_t, ndata);
     sector = cpu_to_le64(sector);
-    memcpy(data, (uint8_t *)&sector, ndata);
+    memcpy(data, (uint8_t *)&sector, MIN(ndata, sizeof(sector)));
     if (sizeof(sector) < ndata) {
         memset(data + sizeof(sector), 0, ndata - sizeof(sector));

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]