qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] hw/timer/mt48t59: Fix bit-rotten NVRAM_PRINTF for


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] hw/timer/mt48t59: Fix bit-rotten NVRAM_PRINTF format strings
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:15:31 +0100

When compiling with NVRAM_PRINTF enabled, gcc currently bails out with:

  CC      hw/timer/m48t59.o
  CC      hw/timer/m48t59-isa.o
hw/timer/m48t59.c: In function ‘NVRAM_writeb’:
hw/timer/m48t59.c:460:5: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned 
int’, but argument 3 has type ‘hwaddr’ [-Werror=format=]
     NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%08x => 0x%08x\n", __func__, addr, val);
     ^
hw/timer/m48t59.c:460:5: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned 
int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
hw/timer/m48t59.c: In function ‘NVRAM_readb’:
hw/timer/m48t59.c:492:5: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned 
int’, but argument 3 has type ‘hwaddr’ [-Werror=format=]
     NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%08x <= 0x%08x\n", __func__, addr, retval);

Fix it by using the correct format strings and while we're at it,
also change the definition of NVRAM_PRINTF so that this can not
bit-rot so easily again.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
---
 hw/timer/m48t59-internal.h | 9 +++------
 hw/timer/m48t59.c          | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/timer/m48t59-internal.h b/hw/timer/m48t59-internal.h
index 32ae957..d0f0caf 100644
--- a/hw/timer/m48t59-internal.h
+++ b/hw/timer/m48t59-internal.h
@@ -25,13 +25,10 @@
 #ifndef HW_M48T59_INTERNAL_H
 #define HW_M48T59_INTERNAL_H 1
 
-//#define DEBUG_NVRAM
+#define M48T59_DEBUG 0
 
-#if defined(DEBUG_NVRAM)
-#define NVRAM_PRINTF(fmt, ...) do { printf(fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
-#else
-#define NVRAM_PRINTF(fmt, ...) do { } while (0)
-#endif
+#define NVRAM_PRINTF(fmt, ...) do { \
+    if (M48T59_DEBUG) { printf(fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } } while (0)
 
 /*
  * The M48T02, M48T08 and M48T59 chips are very similar. The newer '59 has
diff --git a/hw/timer/m48t59.c b/hw/timer/m48t59.c
index 844aad5..4abb4ac 100644
--- a/hw/timer/m48t59.c
+++ b/hw/timer/m48t59.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static void NVRAM_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
uint64_t val,
 {
     M48t59State *NVRAM = opaque;
 
-    NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%08x => 0x%08x\n", __func__, addr, val);
+    NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx" => 0x%"PRIx64"\n", __func__, addr, val);
     switch (addr) {
     case 0:
         NVRAM->addr &= ~0x00FF;
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static uint64_t NVRAM_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
unsigned size)
         retval = -1;
         break;
     }
-    NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%08x <= 0x%08x\n", __func__, addr, retval);
+    NVRAM_PRINTF("%s: 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx" <= 0x%08x\n", __func__, addr, retval);
 
     return retval;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]