qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Header cleanups


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Header cleanups
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:50:00 +0100

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 17:42, Aruna Jayasena <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Yeah this is a stand alone patch.

OK, thanks -- just wanted to check there wasn't a missing
bit. I think this could go in via the qemu-trivial tree
so I have cc'd them.

We're in the middle of a release at the moment, but we
should reopen for development in a couple of weeks. If
this patch still hasn't gone anywhere by a week or so after
that then please follow up with a 'ping' to check it hasn't
been forgotten by accident.

> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 16:58, Aruna Jayasena <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > Removed unwanted includes from cpu-common.h
>> > This task was under https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/BiteSizedTasks
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Aruna Jayasena <address@hidden>
>> >
>> > ---
>> >  include/exec/cpu-common.h | 2 --
>> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
>> > index cef8b88a2a..a3594f3f50 100644
>> > --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
>> > +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
>> > @@ -7,8 +7,6 @@
>> >  #include "exec/hwaddr.h"
>> >  #endif
>> >
>> > -#include "qemu/bswap.h"
>> > -#include "qemu/queue.h"
>> >  #include "qemu/fprintf-fn.h"
>> >
>>
>> I was surprised that no .c files are implicitly relying
>> on these includes, but apparently none are, so we can
>> safely remove them.
>>
>> A couple of notes:
>>  * this doesn't need to go to qemu-stable as it's just a
>>    code cleanup
>>  * did something go wrong with your sending of this patch?
>>    Its subject is "PATCH 0/4" which would usually indicate
>>    a cover letter for a four-patch series, but this seems
>>    to be a stand-alone patch.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]