Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH-for-4.1 3/7] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Rewrite a fall through comment

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 7/19/19 3:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:
> 
>   hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c: In function ‘pflash_write’:
>   hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c:574:16: error: this statement may fall through 
> [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
>     574 |             if (boff == 0x55 && cmd == 0x98) {
>         |                ^
>   hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c:581:9: note: here
>     581 |         default:
>         |         ^~~~~~~
>   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Rewrite the comment using 'fall through' which is recognized by
> GCC and static analyzers.
> 
> Reported-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> index f68837a449..42886f6af5 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static void pflash_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, 
> uint64_t value,
>                  pfl->cmd = 0x98;
>                  return;
>              }
> -            /* No break here */
> +            /* fall through */
>          default:
>              DPRINTF("%s: invalid write for command %02x\n",
>                      __func__, pfl->cmd);
> 

Queued to pflash/next, thanks.