qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] test-vmstate: Fix memleaks in test_load_qlist


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] test-vmstate: Fix memleaks in test_load_qlist
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:06:17 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

Le 20/02/2020 à 14:41, address@hidden a écrit :
> From: Chen Qun <address@hidden>
> 
> There is memleak in test_load_qlist().It's not a big deal,
> but test-vmstate will fail if sanitizers is enabled.
> 
> In addition, "ret" is written twice with the same value
>  in test_gtree_load_iommu().
> 
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/test-vmstate.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/test-vmstate.c b/tests/test-vmstate.c
> index cea363dd69..f7b3868881 100644
> --- a/tests/test-vmstate.c
> +++ b/tests/test-vmstate.c
> @@ -1241,7 +1241,6 @@ static void test_gtree_load_iommu(void)
>      TestGTreeIOMMU *orig_iommu = create_iommu();
>      QEMUFile *fsave, *fload;
>      char eof;
> -    int ret;
>  
>      fsave = open_test_file(true);
>      qemu_put_buffer(fsave, iommu_dump, sizeof(iommu_dump));
> @@ -1250,10 +1249,8 @@ static void test_gtree_load_iommu(void)
>  
>      fload = open_test_file(false);
>      vmstate_load_state(fload, &vmstate_iommu, dest_iommu, 1);
> -    ret = qemu_file_get_error(fload);
>      eof = qemu_get_byte(fload);
> -    ret = qemu_file_get_error(fload);
> -    g_assert(!ret);
> +    g_assert(!qemu_file_get_error(fload));/
>      g_assert_cmpint(orig_iommu->id, ==, dest_iommu->id);
>      g_assert_cmpint(eof, ==, QEMU_VM_EOF);
>  
> @@ -1395,6 +1392,7 @@ static void test_load_qlist(void)
>      compare_containers(orig_container, dest_container);
>      free_container(orig_container);
>      free_container(dest_container);
> +    qemu_fclose(fload);
>  }
>  
>  typedef struct TmpTestStruct {
> 

Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]