[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH V2 12/14] arm/: fix some comment spelling errors
From: |
zhaolichang |
Subject: |
[PATCH V2 12/14] arm/: fix some comment spelling errors |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:44:47 +0800 |
I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/arm.
I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the
folder.
Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude<f4bug@amsat.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 2 +-
target/arm/helper.c | 4 ++--
target/arm/m_helper.c | 2 +-
target/arm/translate-a64.c | 4 ++--
target/arm/translate-sve.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index cfff1b5c8f..985f6834a4 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ static inline bool arm_el_is_aa64(CPUARMState *env, int
el)
return aa64;
}
-/* Function for determing whether guest cp register reads and writes should
+/* Function for determining whether guest cp register reads and writes should
* access the secure or non-secure bank of a cp register. When EL3 is
* operating in AArch32 state, the NS-bit determines whether the secure
* instance of a cp register should be used. When EL3 is AArch64 (or if
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index cd0779ff5f..a23dfdec07 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ static void pmevtyper_rawwrite(CPUARMState *env, const
ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
* pmevtyper_rawwrite is called between a pair of pmu_op_start and
* pmu_op_finish calls when loading saved state for a migration. Because
* we're potentially updating the type of event here, the value written to
- * c14_pmevcntr_delta by the preceeding pmu_op_start call may be for a
+ * c14_pmevcntr_delta by the preceding pmu_op_start call may be for a
* different counter type. Therefore, we need to set this value to the
* current count for the counter type we're writing so that pmu_op_finish
* has the correct count for its calculation.
@@ -12216,7 +12216,7 @@ bool get_phys_addr(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong
address,
} else {
memattr = 0x44; /* Normal, NC, No */
}
- cacheattrs->shareability = 2; /* outer sharable */
+ cacheattrs->shareability = 2; /* outer shareable */
} else {
memattr = 0x00; /* Device, nGnRnE */
}
diff --git a/target/arm/m_helper.c b/target/arm/m_helper.c
index 036454234c..1e8080dc92 100644
--- a/target/arm/m_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/m_helper.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ uint32_t HELPER(v7m_tt)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t addr,
uint32_t op)
* R: 0 because unpriv and A flag not set
* SRVALID: 0 because NS
* MRVALID: 0 because unpriv and A flag not set
- * SREGION: 0 becaus SRVALID is 0
+ * SREGION: 0 because SRVALID is 0
* MREGION: 0 because MRVALID is 0
*/
return 0;
diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
index 7188808341..5451f02995 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void gen_a64_set_pc_im(uint64_t val)
* + for EL2 and EL3 there is only one TBI bit, and if it is set
* then the address is zero-extended, clearing bits [63:56]
* + for EL0 and EL1, TBI0 controls addresses with bit 55 == 0
- * and TBI1 controls addressses with bit 55 == 1.
+ * and TBI1 controls addresses with bit 55 == 1.
* If the appropriate TBI bit is set for the address then
* the address is sign-extended from bit 55 into bits [63:56]
*
@@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ static void handle_sys(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn,
bool isread,
}
if (!isread && !(ri->type & ARM_CP_SUPPRESS_TB_END)) {
/*
- * A write to any coprocessor regiser that ends a TB
+ * A write to any coprocessor register that ends a TB
* must rebuild the hflags for the next TB.
*/
TCGv_i32 tcg_el = tcg_const_i32(s->current_el);
diff --git a/target/arm/translate-sve.c b/target/arm/translate-sve.c
index 9095586fc9..73b0686213 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate-sve.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate-sve.c
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ static bool trans_PNEXT(DisasContext *s, arg_rr_esz *a)
/* Perform an inline saturating addition of a 32-bit value within
* a 64-bit register. The second operand is known to be positive,
- * which halves the comparisions we must perform to bound the result.
+ * which halves the comparisons we must perform to bound the result.
*/
static void do_sat_addsub_32(TCGv_i64 reg, TCGv_i64 val, bool u, bool d)
{
--
2.26.2.windows.1
- [PATCH V2 04/14] rx/: fix some comment spelling errors, (continued)
- [PATCH V2 04/14] rx/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 06/14] mips/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 05/14] tricore/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 10/14] i386/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 07/14] s390x/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 08/14] m68k/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 12/14] arm/: fix some comment spelling errors,
zhaolichang <=
- [PATCH V2 14/14] target/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 09/14] sh4/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 11/14] avr/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- [PATCH V2 13/14] alpha/: fix some comment spelling errors, zhaolichang, 2020/10/09
- Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] fix some comment spelling errors, no-reply, 2020/10/09
- Re: [PATCH V2 00/14] fix some comment spelling errors, Lichang Zhao, 2020/10/19