qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 6/6] migration: fix uninitialized variable warning in migrate


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] migration: fix uninitialized variable warning in migrate_send_rp_req_pages()
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 03:22:08 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1

On 11/3/20 2:52 AM, Chen Qun wrote:
> After the WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD macro is added, the compiler cannot identify
>  that the statements in the macro must be executed. As a result, some 
> variables
>  assignment statements in the macro may be considered as unexecuted by the 
> compiler.
> 
> The compiler showed warning:
> migration/migration.c: In function ‘migrate_send_rp_req_pages’:
> migration/migration.c:384:8: warning: ‘received’ may be used uninitialized in 
> this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  384 |     if (received) {
>      |        ^
> 
> Add a default value for 'received' to prevented the warning.
> 
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
> ---
> Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/migration.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 9bb4fee5ac..de90486a61 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ int migrate_send_rp_req_pages(MigrationIncomingState *mis,
>                                RAMBlock *rb, ram_addr_t start, uint64_t haddr)
>  {
>      void *aligned = (void *)(uintptr_t)(haddr & (-qemu_ram_pagesize(rb)));
> -    bool received;
> +    bool received = false;
>  
>      WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&mis->page_request_mutex) {
>          received = ramblock_recv_bitmap_test_byte_offset(rb, start);
> 

Since this helps static analyzer:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]