[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[QSOS-general] Plone evaluation
From: |
Thierry Benita |
Subject: |
[QSOS-general] Plone evaluation |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:27:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Hello,
I found qsos a very interesting initiative and made a Plone evaluation
(CMS based).
What should I do in order to integrate and maintain it ? I join it to
this mail.
Kind regards,
Thierry Benita.
--
atReal Xnet - http://www.atreal.net - address@hidden
atReal collectivités - http://www.atreal.fr - address@hidden
Tél : +33 4 91 29 42 81 - Fax - +33 4 91 29 42 82
Spécialiste Zope et Plone
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<document>
<header>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Thierry Benita</name>
<email>address@hidden</email>
</author>
</authors>
<dates>
<creation></creation>
<validation></validation>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<appname>Plone</appname>
<release>3.0.5</release>
<licenseid>31</licenseid>
<licensedesc>GNU GPL</licensedesc>
<url>http://plone.org</url>
<desc> Plone is powerful and flexible. It is ideal as an intranet and
extranet server, as a document publishing system, a portal server and as a
groupware tool for collaboration between separately located entities.
Plone is easy to use. The Plone Team includes usability experts who have made
Plone easy and attractive for content managers to add, update, and maintain
content.
Plone is easy to install. You can install Plone with a click-and-run installer,
and have a content management system running on your computer in just a few
minutes.
Plone is international. The Plone interface has been translated into over 40
languages, and tools exist for managing multilingual content.
Plone is standard. Plone carefully follows standards for usability and
accessibility. Plone pages are compliant with US Section 508, and the W3C's AA
rating for accessibility, in addition to using best-practice web standards like
XHTML and CSS.
Plone is Open Source. Plone is licensed under the GNU General Public License,
the same license Linux uses. This gives you the right to use Plone without a
license fee, and to improve upon the product.
Plone is supported. There are close to a hundred developers in the Plone
Development Team around the world, and a multitude of companies specializing in
Plone development and support.
Plone is extensible. There are many add-on products for Plone that add new
features and content types. In addition, Plone can be scripted using web
standard solutions and Open Source languages.
Plone is technology neutral. Plone can interoperate with most relational
database systems, open source and commercial, and runs on a vast array of
platforms, including Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, Solaris and BSD.
Plone is protected. The nonprofit Plone Foundation was formed in 2004 to
promote the use of Plone around the world and protect the Plone IP and
trademarks.
Plone is built using Zope, an object oriented application server. The language
that drives Zope and Plone is Python - the agile language preferred by Google,
NASA, Industrial Light and Magic and many others. Why? Because Python offers
unprecedented programmer productivity.</desc>
<demourl>http://plone.org</demourl>
<qsosformat>1.7</qsosformat>
<qsosappfamily>cms</qsosappfamily>
<qsosappname></qsosappname>
<qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
<desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
<element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
<desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
<element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
<desc>Maturity</desc>
<element name="age" title="Age">
<desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
<desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
<desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="stability" title="Stability">
<desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
<desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old.
Difficulties to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
<desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes
corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="historyknownproblems" title="History, known
problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
<desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
<desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of
being forked in the future</desc1>
<desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does
not come from a fork either</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
<desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
<element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
<desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
<desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="references" title="References">
<desc0>None</desc0>
<desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
<desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing
Community">
<desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing
list, ...)</desc0>
<desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
<desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="books" title="books">
<desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
<desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are available</desc1>
<desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in
several languages</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
<desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
<element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
<desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly
identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
<desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
<desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
<desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
<desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="activity" title="Activity">
<desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
<element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
<desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified
developers with important turnover</desc1>
<desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
<desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
<desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks
assignment</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
<desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
<desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by
user's request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
<desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction
with roadmap</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
<desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
<desc1>Activity on production and developmenet releases.
Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
<desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs
fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
<desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
<element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
<desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
<desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
<desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="services" title="Services">
<desc>Services offering</desc>
<element name="training" title="Training">
<desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
<desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in serveral
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="support" title="Support">
<desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor
without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
<desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
<desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
<desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
serveral languages</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
<desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
<desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to
one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
<desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
<desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle
with publication of results</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="tools" title="Tools">
<desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
<desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge)
but poorly used</desc1>
<desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
<desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
<desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
<desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
<desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
<desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>The generis POSIX package can work on any POSIX
compliant system</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Many Plone developpers use Mac OSX.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
<desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
<desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
<desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
<desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important
issues or just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
<desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is
provided</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
<desc>Exploitability level</desc>
<element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
<desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
<desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
<desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated
ergonomics</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
<desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
<desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
<desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
<desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
<element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
<desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
<desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
<desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software
by selecting or creating modules</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
<desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
<desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
<desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="codeextension" title="Code extension">
<desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
<desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
<desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
<desc>Project's strategy</desc>
<element name="license" title="License">
<desc>License</desc>
<element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
<desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
<desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
<desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
<desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
<desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
<desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
<desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
<desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
<desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
<desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
<desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
<desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
<desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
<desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
<desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
<desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical
independence">
<desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor(person, company,sponsor)</desc0>
<desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
<desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name="documentmanagement" title="Document content management">
<desc>this section describe how the application manage document</desc>
<element name="importformatsupported" title="Mime Type supported">
<desc>Supported means that the internal engine is able to read or
parse file content to create preview file or find key words</desc>
<element name="importtext" title="text formats">
<element name="importformathtml" title="HTML files">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importformatrtf" title="RTF (Rich Text Format)">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importformatcsv" title="CSV">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importformatxml" title="XML files">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="importformatopenoffice" title="Office Suite">
<element name="importformatopendocument" title="Opendocument files">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importformatooo" title="MS Office files">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>partially native and plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importformatpdf" title="PDF files">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>partially native and plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="importpicutre" title="picture formats">
<element name="importcommonpictureformat" title="common file
format">
<desc>Format are: jpg, gif, png, bmp, tiff, xpm, </desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importvectorialformat" title="common vectorial
format">
<desc>Format are: wmf, svg</desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="importcommercialpcitureformat" title="commercial
formats">
<desc>Format are: psp (PaintShopPro), psd (Photopshop)</desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-ins possible on demand</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="importvideo" title="Video Formats">
<desc>Format videos</desc>
<element name="importmpeg" title="MPEG Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importavi" title="AVI Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importdvix" title="Dvix Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="importaudio" title="Audio Formats">
<desc>Format videos</desc>
<element name="importmp3" title="MP3 Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importwav" title="Wav Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="importogg" title="Ogg Format">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="fileconversion" title="File Conversion">
<element name="textformat" title="Text format">
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="pictureformat" title="Picture Format (jpg, png, bpm,
gif)">
<desc0>not supported</desc0>
<desc1>partialy (buggy or limited feature)</desc1>
<desc2>fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="audioformat" title="Audio Format">
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is supported</desc2>
<comment> plug-in</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="videoformat" title="Video Format">
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="filemanipulation" title="File Manipulation">
<element name="compressedfile" title="Compressed File Browsing">
<element name="zipfilesprowsing" title="ZIP files">
<desc>zip files</desc>
<desc0>The engine see zip file as opaque binary</desc0>
<desc1>The engine can browse zip archive with limitation (need
of a specific action from the use, content not indexed, no keyword can by
attached to its content).</desc1>
<desc2>Zip archive are seen like common folder.</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="rarfilesprowsing" title="RAR files">
<desc>rar files</desc>
<desc0>The engine see rar file as opaque binary</desc0>
<desc1>The engine can browse rar archive with limitation (need
of a specific action from the use, content not indexed, no keyword can by
attached to its content).</desc1>
<desc2>Rar archive are seen like common folder.</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="tarfilesprowsing" title="TAR files">
<desc>tar.gz, tar.bz2 and tar.Z archives</desc>
<desc0>The engine see tar file as opaque binary</desc0>
<desc1>The engine can browse tar archive with limitation (need
of a specific action from the use, content not indexed, no keyword can by
attached to its content).</desc1>
<desc2>Tarball archive are seen like common folder.</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="previewcreation" title="Preview creation">
<desc>Please keep in mind that here we just evaluate the object
creation (does it work or not). We ignore how the results are published (e.g:
poor visiblity).</desc>
<element name="picturepreview" title="Picture preview">
<desc0>The software can't create picture preview</desc0>
<desc1>The software create picture preview for all the major
formats (jpg, png, bmp, gif)</desc1>
<desc2>The software can create preview for more than 10 pictures
formats</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="odtpreview" title="OpenOffice files preview">
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Work fine for at last odt files</desc1>
<desc2>Work fine for the majority of the formats</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="mswordpreview" title="MS Office files preview">
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Work fine for at last doc files</desc1>
<desc2>Work fine for the majority of the formats</desc2>
<comment>plug-in</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="videopreview" title="Video preview">
<desc>Please keep in mind that DRM protected file can't be load
without official from its manifacturer. Because of this limitation, we prefere
to ignore these files in this evaluation. Preview could be a little preview
movie (e.g: in flash format) or just a picture.</desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The software doesn't support the majority of the
files</desc1>
<desc2>The software can create preview for a large amount of
files</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="audiopreview" title="Audio files preview">
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Work fine for at last odt files</desc1>
<desc2>Work fine for the majority of the formats</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name="webcontentmanagement" title="Web content management">
<desc>this section describe how the application manage web page</desc>
<comment>This feature will be implemented in september 2007 in the Nuxeo
EP 5.2</comment>
<element name="blog" title="Blog">
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Work fine for at last odt files</desc1>
<desc2>Work fine for the majority of the formats</desc2>
<comment>Plone offers several Blog plug-ins that include RSS features
and access rights management.
Blogs can therefore be added in any part of the Plone site, like all other
plug-ins.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="updatenotification" title="Support for new content or
update notifications">
<element name="recentchanges" title="recent changes advertised on the
web interface">
<desc0>No such features</desc0>
<desc1>recent changes advertised according to the today's
date</desc1>
<desc2>recent changes advertised only changes that happened since
user's last visit</desc2>
<comment>Recent changes are based on access rights and publication
date.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="othernotifications" title="support for other
notifications media">
<desc>Do detail the media in the comment section</desc>
<desc0>This feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature exists for one communication media</desc1>
<desc2>This feature exists for several media: e.mail, and IM for
instance </desc2>
<comment>Plone events model allow to have any king of notification
on events : publication, motification, workflow state, copy, paste etc.
Plone can notify on any kind of media : e-mail is native, SMS, IM are supported
via plug-ins</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name="commonservice " title="Common Service">
<desc> common services betwen ECM an Document managment </desc>
<element name="search" title="Support for search">
<desc>The metadata and media content support is to be detailed in the
above metadata and mediasupport elements </desc>
<element name="searchengine" title="Search Engine feature">
<desc0>No search engine available</desc0>
<desc1>Searches are limited (to filename, metadata or text content
for instance)</desc1>
<desc2>Searches are feasable through most of the media content and
the metadata</desc2>
<comment>All content types can be fully indexed : full content and
metadata</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="searchAPI" title="Search API for more detailed results
in the contents and their meta-data">
<desc0>This feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature exist but is limited.</desc1>
<desc2>This feature is fully powered</desc2>
<comment>There are global searches (1 field) and multi-criterias
searches.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="pluginsandpluginability" title="Plugins, pluginability,
built-in objects, and page templates">
<element name="pluginability" title="plugin ability">
<desc>adequate software architecture for custom plugin creation,
easy plugin interface
for writing your own additions. Do
detail in the comment section the supported plugin languages </desc>
<desc0>monolitic not pluggable</desc0>
<desc1>modular plugable but plugin not provided</desc1>
<desc2>modular plugins provided</desc2>
<comment>more than 400 plug-ins</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="remoteAPI" title="XML/RPC Remote API">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>poor API</desc1>
<desc2>rich API</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="webserviceplugin" title="web service plugin">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="builtinobjects" title="builtin objects or plugins">
<element name="calendars" title="Calendars and Calendars events">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>partially or poorly implemented </desc1>
<desc2>well done</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="polls" title="polls and vote editing and publishing">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>partially or poorly implemented </desc1>
<desc2>well done</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="photoalbums" title="photo albums editing and
publishing">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>partially or poorly implemented </desc1>
<desc2>well done</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="slideshows" title="slide show editing and launching
within the internet browser">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>partially or poorly implemented </desc1>
<desc2>well done</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="versioncontrol" title="On line version control">
<desc> The documents targeted by the version control are those listed
as fully supported in the above "documentsupport" elements </desc>
<element name="history" title="online access to each pages/docs (of
fully supported media) history/versioning">
<desc0>No history/versioning</desc0>
<desc1>limited number of document revisions</desc1>
<desc2>unlimited number of document revisions</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="diff" title="online supports for version differencing
diff and retrieving prior versions.">
<desc0>No diff feature</desc0>
<desc1>Revision Diffs with the latest</desc1>
<desc2>Revision Diffs with the all</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="rollback" title="online supports for
retrieving/rollbacking to prior versions.">
<desc0>No rollback feature</desc0>
<desc1>rollback to the latest</desc1>
<desc2>rollback to all</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="accesspoints" title="Access Points">
<desc>Describe how we can connect to the repository </desc>
<element name="web" title="Web">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="FTP" title="FTP">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="webdav" title="Webdav">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="CIFS" title="CIFS">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="aggregatedfeeds" title="Aggregated Feeds">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>RSS OR ATOM </desc1>
<desc2>RSS AND ATOM</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="Webservice" title="Web Services">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="Servlet" title="Servlet">
<desc0>No such feature</desc0>
<desc1>limited integration capabilities</desc1>
<desc2>good capabilities</desc2>
<comment>This feature is specific to Java platforms. Zope has its
own equivalent feature.</comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name="workprocess " title="Work Process">
<desc> Description of the internal work proces </desc>
<element name="editing" title="Edition tools">
<element name="journalisedchanges" title="Journalised Changes">
<desc0>No revision control system exist.</desc0>
<desc1>Every saved document are archived. Go back to an old
revision need an important amount of work.</desc1>
<desc2>Every change done with the internal editor are logged. It's
easy to come back to an old revision of the document from another user.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="editwithstandalonetools" title="Standalone edition
tools">
<desc0>In oder to edit a document the user use the official
tool.</desc0>
<desc1>It's possible to use a remote stand alone tool to edit
documents.</desc1>
<desc2>All common feature are supported by a last one stand alone
tool.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="workflow" title="Workflow">
<element name="workflowlock" title="Lock">
<desc>Ability to lock file avoid data lost or synchronization
issues</desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature just exists, an administrator can quickly unlock
a file </desc1>
<desc2>The feature exist, administrator can quickly unlock a file
and a timeout system exists to unlock file after a certain amount of
time.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="workflowstep" title="step by step workflow">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature just exist</desc1>
<desc2>This feature is fully powered</desc2>
<comment>Plone includes a very flexible workflow component. It
allows to manage rights based on states and roles on any object. Events can be
handeled and triggered in order to link the workflow with other events into
Plone.
There is no limit in workflow states and transitions.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="workflowbpel" title="BPEL support">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature just exist</desc1>
<desc2>This feature is fully powered</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="metadata" title="Meta data">
<comment>Meta data are infromation related to a document like (author,
copyright holder, ...)</comment>
<element name="keyword" title="Key word support">
<desc>Metadata are all the specific key work that can be attached
to a document </desc>
<desc0>Can't add specific key words</desc0>
<desc1>Key word can be added but with limitation: limited list, no
easy to way extend the list</desc1>
<desc2>key words easily added and features are easily
extended</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="hierarchicalclassification" title="Hierarchical
Classification">
<desc>Ability to do a classication in a predesigned hierarchy</desc>
<desc0>This feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature exist but is limited.</desc1>
<desc2>A new document can quickly be registered in the
hierarchy</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name="applicationarchitecture " title="Architecture">
<element name="security" title="Security">
<element name="authentifaction" title="Authentification Backend">
<element name="authenbackendldap" title="LDAP">
<desc0>No LDAP based authentification availble</desc0>
<desc1>LDAP availble but limited (e.g: group mapping limited,
etc)</desc1>
<desc2>LDAP is one of the recommended authentification
backend</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="authenbackendad" title="Active Directory">
<desc0>No Active Directory based authentification
availble</desc0>
<desc1>Active Directory availble but limited (e.g: group mapping
limited, etc)</desc1>
<desc2>Active Directory is one of the recommended
authentification backend</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="authenbackenddb" title="data base">
<desc>Here we do not attach importance on supported data bases,
please see the storage section</desc>
<desc0>No data base base authentification availble</desc0>
<desc1>Data base availble but limited (e.g: group mapping
limited, etc)</desc1>
<desc2>Data base is one of the recommended authentification
backend</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="signaturemechansim" title="Signature">
<desc>Is possible to create digital cypher (e.g: GNU PGP)</desc>
<desc0>Feature not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Fetautre partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="digitalwatermarking" title="Digital watermarking">
<desc0>Feature not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Fetautre partialy supported </desc1>
<desc2>Feature fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="DRM" title="DRM">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Fetautre partialy supported </desc1>
<desc2>Feature fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="SSL" title="SSL">
<desc></desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>Fetautre partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="storage" title="Storage">
<desc>Please keep in mind, that the score doesn't mean that an element
is good or bad. e.g: a solution that doesn't use the filesystem for the data
storage can be good. See: QSOS Method to get more details</desc>
<element name="filesystem" title="File System">
<desc>Can the solution use the file system to store data (files,
description, ...). Please, descript the recommended environment.</desc>
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is fully supported</desc2>
<comment>Blobs are stored on file system.
There can be views of file-system contents.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="database" title="Data Base">
<desc>No data storage available. Please, descript the recommended
environment.</desc>
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is fully supported</desc2>
<comment>Plone can connect to external relational databases for
specific applications.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="datawarehouse" title="Data Warehouse">
<desc>Can user create link to physical material like book or paper
document?</desc>
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is fully supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="clustering" title="Clustering">
<element name="multisite" title="Multisite architecure">
<desc0>Application is not designed to support Multisite architecure
</desc0>
<desc1>Can be done with a third party</desc1>
<desc2>Application supports Multisite architecure </desc2>
<comment>Plone inter-appllications model allows to have
multi-sites and multi applications architechture.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="loadbalancing" title="Load balancing">
<desc0>Application is not designed to support Load balancing
</desc0>
<desc1>Can be done with a third party</desc1>
<desc2>Application supports Load balancing </desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="failover" title="Fail over">
<desc0>Application is not designed to support fail over </desc0>
<desc1>Can be done with a third party</desc1>
<desc2>Application supports fail over </desc2>
<comment>Fail over of cluster nodes is native.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="repositoryreplication " title="Repository Replication ">
<desc0>Application is not designed to support Repository
replication</desc0>
<desc1>Can be done with a third party</desc1>
<desc2>Application supports Repository replication</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="indexreplication" title="Index Replication">
<desc0>Application is not designed to support Index
replication</desc0>
<desc1>Can be done with a third party</desc1>
<desc2>Application supports Index replication</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="administration" title="Administration">
<element name="rights" title="Rights">
<element name="usersrights" title="User's rights">
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="groupesrights" title="Group's rights">
<desc0>Feature is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Feature is partialy supported</desc1>
<desc2>Feature is supported</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="role" title="Role">
<desc>Can we create a virtual user with specific rights and give
his rights to phyical people (e.g: the role "backup administrator" read access
on the data base)</desc>
<desc0>The feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature exists but is limited</desc1>
<desc2>The Feature is available or can easily be simulated
thanks to a powerful group system</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</section>
<section name=" Webcompatibility " title="Web compatibility">
<desc> all this section was validated thanks to http://validator.w3.org
</desc>
<element name="webstandards" title="Standards">
<element name="htmlstandard" title="HTML">
<desc>http://validator.w3.org</desc>
<desc0>Page not valid (parse errors)</desc0>
<desc1>Page not valid with important errors (encoding
mismatch)</desc1>
<desc2>Page valid, or with minor errors (missing "alt" attribute,
use of unknow attribute)</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="xhtmlstandard" title="XHTML">
<desc>http://validator.w3.org</desc>
<desc0>Page not valid (parse errors)</desc0>
<desc1>Page not valid with important errors (encoding
mismatch)</desc1>
<desc2>Page valid, or with minor errors (missing "alt" attribute,
use of unknow attribute)</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="cssstandard" title="CSS">
<desc>http://validator.w3.org</desc>
<desc0>CSS doesn't or no valid not valide (parse errors)</desc0>
<desc1>CSS not valid with important errors (encoding
mismatch)</desc1>
<desc2>CSS valid, or with minor errors (missing "alt" attribute,
use of unknow attribute)</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="webbestpractice" title="Best Practices">
<desc>http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/bestwebdev.htmls</desc>
<element name="tablepsitioning" title="Table Positioning">
<desc>html tables should not be used for layout/positioning, css is
there to help.</desc>
<desc2>html tables are not used for layout/positioning</desc2>
<desc1>not too much used</desc1>
<desc0>systematically, too much used</desc0>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="frameuse" title="Frame use">
<desc>Frame use </desc>
<desc2>frame are not used</desc2>
<desc1>frame are rarely used</desc1>
<desc0>systematically, too much used</desc0>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="iframeuse" title="iFrame use">
<desc>iFrame use </desc>
<desc2>iframe are not used</desc2>
<desc1>iframe are rarely used</desc1>
<desc0>systematically, too much used</desc0>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="cssdesignedforprintout" title="css designed for
printout">
<desc>css designed for printout</desc>
<desc0>no</desc0>
<desc1>yes, but print-outs are not well rendered for a few use
cases.</desc1>
<desc2>yes</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="supportedbrowser" title="Supported Browsers">
<desc>Supported Browser</desc>
<element name="browsermozillafirefox" title="Mozilla and Firefox">
<desc>Firefox, please detail the supported version in the comment
section</desc>
<desc0>not supported at all</desc0>
<desc1>not officially supported, but works ok or good
enough.</desc1>
<desc2>supported and advised browser</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="browserkonqueror" title="Konqueror">
<desc>Konqueror, please detail the supported version in the comment
section</desc>
<desc0>not supported at all</desc0>
<desc1>not officially supported, but works ok or good
enough.</desc1>
<desc2>supported and advised browser</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
<element name="browsermsie" title="MSIE">
<desc>MSIE, please detail the supported version in the comment
section</desc>
<desc0>not supported at all</desc0>
<desc1>not officially supported, but works ok or good
enough.</desc1>
<desc2>supported and advised browser</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="browsersafari" title="Safari">
<desc>Safarie, please detail the supported version in the comment
section</desc>
<desc0>not supported at all</desc0>
<desc1>not officially supported, but works ok or good
enough.</desc1>
<desc2>supported and advised browser</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="browserlegacy" title="legacy browsers">
<desc>Legacy browser are browser outdated like MSIE4 and Netscape
4, please detail the
supported version in the comment section.</desc>
<desc0>not supported at all</desc0>
<desc1>not officially supported, but works ok or good
enough.</desc1>
<desc2>supported and advised browser</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</element>
<element name="browserrequiredenablings" title="Required enablings">
<desc>Browser required enablings: javascript, applet, SVG, and flash.
Reminder: here, a higher score does not mean a better product nor the opposite,
it really depends on your needs and non functional requirements. </desc>
<element name="javascriptrequired" title="Javascript required">
<desc> Is the browser javascript enabling required ? If the score
is 1 or 2, do indicate in the comment section the required jvm version. If the
score is 1, do detail. </desc>
<desc0>The interface makes no use of javascript, and thus, does not
need javascript to run at full flavor and speed </desc0>
<desc1>The interface makes use of javascript but can properly
function without it.</desc1>
<desc2>Javascript is necessary to use the interface (beacuse it's
AJAX based for instance).</desc2>
<comment>Is javascript is not available, the interface is gradually
degrated when the browser is poor or too old.</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="jvmrequired" title="a Java plugin is required">
<desc>Does the browser needs a java plugin (to enable applet) ? If
the score is 1 or 2, do indicate in the comment section the required jvm
version. If the score is 1, do detail. </desc>
<desc0>The interface does not contains any applet, and thus, does
not need java to run at full flavor and speed </desc0>
<desc1>The interface makes use of applet(s) but can properly
function without it.</desc1>
<desc2>A Java plugin is necessary to use the interface, the applets
are key players in it.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="svgrequired" title="a SVG plugin is required">
<desc> Does the browser needs a SVG plugin ? If score is 1 or 2, do
indicate in the comment section the required SVG version. If the score is 1, do
detail. </desc>
<desc0>The interface does not contains any SVG graph, and thus,
does not need any SVG plugin to run at full flavor and speed </desc0>
<desc1>The interface makes use of SVG but can properly function
without it.</desc1>
<desc2>A SVG plugin is necessary to use the interface, the SVG
graph are part of key features of the interface.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="flashrequired" title="a flash plugin is required">
<desc>Does the browser needs a flash plugin ? If score is 1 or 2,
do indicate in the comment section the required flash version. If the score is
1, do detail. </desc>
<desc0>The interface does not contains any flash graph, and thus,
does not need any flash plugin to run at full flavor and speed </desc0>
<desc1>The interface makes use of flash but can properly function
without it.</desc1>
<desc2>A flash plugin is necessary to use the interface, the
interface is mainly made of
flash.</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
<element name="rss" title="support for rss feed">
<desc>Do detail the rss feed format/protocol in the comment
section</desc>
<desc0>This feature doesn't exist</desc0>
<desc1>The feature exists but is limited</desc1>
<desc2>This feature exists and feeds are tunable and/or atom feeds
are available</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
</section>
</document>
- [QSOS-general] Plone evaluation,
Thierry Benita <=