[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[QSOS-general] Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source
From: |
Raphael Semeteys |
Subject: |
[QSOS-general] Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:31:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi,
I just discovered your paper "Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open
Source Software: OpenBRR & QSOS".
It is very interesting, specially because it give us an external point of view
on QSOS and on how it compares to OpenBRR.
Do not hesitate to contact me if you need more precisions regarding QSOS and
its roadmap. For instance we do intent to add a <source> tag in our XML format
(http://qsos.org/wiki/index.php/XML_formats).
I've read in the conclusion that you intended to create a new Assessment
Methodology. Maybe we could discuss a little more on what you don't like in
QSOS because, since it's a free project, it is expected to change and to be
changed by a community.
I had an interesting discussion with OpenBRR guys a few years ago on our
scoring models. We choose a 3-level scoring scale to one make evaluating work
the more independant from any other one. Our strategy was : fewer levels
(bad/average/good or no covered/partially covered/fully covered) for less
subjectivity...
I hope to read you soon.
Best regards,
Raphaƫl Semeteys
QSOS Project - http://www.qsos.org
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [QSOS-general] Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source,
Raphael Semeteys <=