[QSOS-general] Re: Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source

[Jean-Christophe DEPREZ]

Hello Raphael,

I am glad you found the article interesting.
I also see that you will be participating at the Open World Forum (on 
Dec 1st).
We are in back-to-back sessions in the Qualipso-OSOR forum.
If you will be around in the afternoon (may right after my session even).
then we can discuss about QualOSS and QSOS and see how to collaborate.

Cheers,
Jean-Christophe


Raphael Semeteys wrote, On 10/22/2008 07:31 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered your paper "Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source 
> Software: OpenBRR & QSOS".
> It is very interesting, specially because it give us an external point of view on QSOS and on how it compares to OpenBRR. 
>
> Do not hesitate to contact me if you need more precisions regarding QSOS and its 
> roadmap. For instance we do intent to add a <source> tag in our XML format 
> (http://qsos.org/wiki/index.php/XML_formats).
>
> I've read in the conclusion that you intended to create a new Assessment 
> Methodology. Maybe we could discuss a little more on what you don't like in 
> QSOS because, since it's a free project, it is expected to change and to be 
> changed by a community.
>
> I had an interesting discussion with OpenBRR guys a few years ago on our 
> scoring models. We choose a 3-level scoring scale to one make evaluating work 
> the more independant from any other one. Our strategy was : fewer levels 
> (bad/average/good or no covered/partially covered/fully covered) for less 
> subjectivity...
>
> I hope to read you soon.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Raphaël Semeteys
> QSOS Project - http://www.qsos.org
>