[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Dude, you killed my diffstat ;)
From: |
Andreas Gruenbacher |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Dude, you killed my diffstat ;) |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jun 2004 03:44:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Friday 11 June 2004 18:22, Tom Rini wrote:
> ... and I been meaning to see what it'd take to add something like that
> in. Is there a reason it's not used by default (additional dependancy)
> ?
The additional dependency is not the main reason. I really don't want to force
stuff like that onto people who have no interest in it.
Some additional tweaking will be required to make things like the
"Signed-off-by" lines survive (for kernel patches; they are expected at the
end of patches). Only comments at the beginning of patches are retained; a
robust patch parser seems a nasty thing to do, especially because of the
various existing patch formats.
Cheers,
--
Andreas Gruenbacher <address@hidden>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX AG