[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Submit patch: allow "quilt delete" to delete patch files
From: |
Martin Quinson |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Submit patch: allow "quilt delete" to delete patch files |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:53:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:41:36AM -0700, Joe Green wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>Or, since it's contradictory with the existance of --backup, maybe
> >>--remove, ie the long option only.
> >>
> >>After all, we can live with long options only, thanks to the completion ;)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I don't think so. Not everyone uses bash completion or zsh. Thois option
> >is likely to be typed often, as I can easily imagine that some users
> >will want to use it for some of their patches and not the other ones (so
> >it can't be set in QUILT_DELETE_OPTIONS). As quilt does seem to offer
> >only one name (either long or short) for each option, I'd go with -r.
> >
> >
> I agree. I seriously considered calling it "--remove" but decided on
> "-r" for similar reasons. I think "--backup" is more likely to be set
> globally from QUILTRC, using either QUILT_DELETE_ARGS or QUILT_BACKUP.
>
> The latter is the reason why "--backup" requires "-r" rather than being
> an alternative to it. I didn't want to introduce a silent change in the
> behavior of delete for people who are already using QUILT_BACKUP. This
> is also why "--backup" is silently ignored if "-r" is missing rather
> than generating a usage error.
Fine with me, then. I take it back.
Mt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature