[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks
From: |
Dean Roehrich |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:56:26 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 06:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Note that I did _not_ fully update "import" as there seemed to be some
> > disagreement on the recent option renaming from -n to -P. Depending on
> > the outcome, we may need to update bash_completion again before the
> > release.
>
> I don't see an advantage in using -n instead of -P (and thus reverting the -n
> to -p change). Does anybody think that -P as used in import vs. -P as used in
> other commands would confuse users?
If no one else is attached to -n then there's certainly no need to keep it
around. My concern is purely personal, of course--I type 'import -n' almost
daily, and I rarely use -p/-P on the commands which have it. On the other
hand, we won't really know until it's packaged and begins to spread; and then
it'll be too late.
I'm not going to object too much. Compared to adding -P to things like
push/pop, this is nothing.
Dean
- [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Jean Delvare, 2006/01/27
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Jean Delvare, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Jean Delvare, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Jean Delvare, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks, Jean Delvare, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks,
Dean Roehrich <=