rdiff-backup-bugs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Rdiff-backup-bugs] [bug #23623] How stable is the development version?


From: Christian Hattemer
Subject: [Rdiff-backup-bugs] [bug #23623] How stable is the development version?
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:32:20 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20061105 Firefox/1.5.0.7

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?23623>

                 Summary: How stable is the development version?
                 Project: rdiff-backup
            Submitted by: krille
            Submitted on: Tuesday 06/17/2008 at 23:32
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: None
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Hi,

seems I can't reopen, so here's a new one, related to #22407.

As seen in the summary, how stable is the development version considered to
be? Will it be released as a stable version sometime soon?

Since the last stable release was about 1.5 years ago and there have been
important fixes, like the one reported previously, it seems like a good idea
to create a new release, if there aren't outstanding bugs left.

As for the testcase, do you want a script that would create a setup as
described in my previous report? I think the description there has all
relevant details. If you have already tested the situation for your previous
reply, then I don't think it would be necessary to do it again with an
automatically created environment.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?23623>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]