Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug

repo-criteria-discuss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug

From:	Craig Topham
Subject:	Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug
Date:	Tue, 8 Feb 2022 12:13:43 -0500
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/91.5.0

repo-criteria-discuss folks,

I'm not familiar with the process. How can we move forward on evaluatingsourcehut, codeberg and notabug?


It seems the necessary work has already been done.
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Sourcehut
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Notabug

~Craig

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug, Craig Topham <=
- Re: Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug, Greg Farough, 2022/02/08

Prev by Date: Re: The "GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations" should consider add sourcehut and codeberg
Next by Date: Installing backlog of approved changes
Previous by thread: Re: The "GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations" should consider add sourcehut and codeberg
Next by thread: Re: Moving forward with evaluating sourcehut, codeberg and notabug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread