[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CodeBerg addition
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: CodeBerg addition |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:19:43 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I imagine RMS had different impressions reading the summaries of the
> license suggestion issue. If we emphasize that there's this flaw in the
> UI, it looks more like failure. If we emphasize that non-free licenses
> are not allowed, then it looks like a UI glitch but a practical pass.
Could you please spell out concretely what you are recommending?
Which of these criteria would Codeberg pass and which would it fail?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)