[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] gentoo linux and nano
From: |
Devon |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] gentoo linux and nano |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:04:32 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 07 April 2002 11:51 am, address@hidden wrote:
> I was reading this article on k5.
>
> http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/4/202113/7370
>
> About installing with gentoo. Very interesting. Much like slinky.
I believe that Slinky is far and away easier to install than Gentoo.
But, yes, the install does seem similar to a point.
> "A word of caution; get in the habit of always using the -w switch with
> nano. If you do not use the -w switch nano's word wrap feature will
> jack up your config files."
>
> Something we need to highlight.
For what it's worth, 'pico' behaves the same way. The -w flag disables
word wrap, otherwise, word wrap is on by default.
I've disabled wordwrap (and enabled the help screens) in nano.
It's a configure option. I left word wrap and the -w flag available for
mortal users, and disabled it for 'root'. I can also disable it across
the board. Thoughts anyone?
I'll include the new nano in the next set of images.
By the way in the FYI department:
nano, compiled against uClibc=169k
Against glibc, you ask? 594k
Those are the striped sizes using the same config options, with the
exception of the glibc path.
- -D
- --
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8sQjAeMAUbzJhSVcRAv54AJ0WOJQJtWVlyJluQFSMLVkROJQlNQCfS9Z1
nZ992Id/R44H8spe6+9lrQU=
=Dx64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Rule-list] gentoo linux and nano, Rodolfo J. Paiz, 2002/04/08