[Savannah-cvs] [122] rm dup-except-for-case file

[karl]

Revision: 122
          
http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=administration&revision=122
Author:   karl
Date:     2014-12-06 23:12:33 +0000 (Sat, 06 Dec 2014)
Log Message:
-----------
rm dup-except-for-case file

Removed Paths:
-------------
    trunk/sviki/HomePageAvailabilityOfPhpAndMysql.mdwn

Deleted: trunk/sviki/HomePageAvailabilityOfPhpAndMysql.mdwn
===================================================================
--- trunk/sviki/HomePageAvailabilityOfPhpAndMysql.mdwn  2014-12-06 02:57:58 UTC 
(rev 121)
+++ trunk/sviki/HomePageAvailabilityOfPhpAndMysql.mdwn  2014-12-06 23:12:33 UTC 
(rev 122)
@@ -1,43 +0,0 @@
-Neither PHP nor MySQL are available for projects' web pages on Savannah.
-We could offer this facility if anyone is ready to volunteer to maintain
-this for Savannah and gnu.org in the long run. Installing it is not a
-big deal; however, making sure it actually works as expected day after
-day requires lot of attention (and perpetual worry).
-
-The same goes for Perl, Python, or any other CGI.
-
-An excerpt from a mail exchange with (past FSF sysadmin) James Blair:
-
-        I don't think we should support dynamic content right now.
-
-        There is of course the security issue. Savannah and
-        http://www.gnu.org are both very important servers and I'm not
-        sure it's worth the risk.
-
-        Probably more importantly, they are both pretty heavily loaded
-        at the moment, and I'm not sure we should be adding any more
-        work for them.
-
-Comments
---------
-
-**SSI** --steelemeal, Tue, 20 May 2008 17:00:28 +0000
-What about Server Side Includes?
-
-**sandboxing and virtualization** --foo, Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:38:19 +0000
-
-Seeing that it is 2010... shouldn't it be possible to set up the
-savannah web server as a reverse proxy and have it get its content from
-virtualized/sandboxed instances? That should ease some of the pains in
-regard to security AND performance...
-
-**Re: sandboxing and virtualization** --Beuc, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:14:42
-
-If you provide a solution that manages 3000 instances (one per project)
-without taking up all the RAM, with good performance balance so that 1
-resource-intensive instance won't affect other instances (and so that
-all instances still have decent performances each), with a network setup
-that prevent abuses (spam, etc.), then we could install it. Oh wait, we
-have the same kind of issues with a basic, Apache-based shared hosting
-already :/ So what good would virtualization provide here, beside more
-complexity?