[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:30:36 +0100 |
Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:07:04PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Hi Jim,
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> > Did you repack the repository somehow? I found it repacked after the
>> > import, and I don't remember doing so :)
>>
>> No :)
>> I did this:
>>
>> git-push ssh+git://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/gnulib master:refs/heads/master
>
> <ShadeHawk> Beuc: with new git, if pack file downloaded cross some
> threshold (also I think for push) it is stored thickened, instead of
> exploded into loose objects on receiving
>
> Nifty :)
Nice, indeed.
Thanks for letting us know.
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/28
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Bob Proulx, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/11/29
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: reliable, incremental git->cvs ?,
Jim Meyering <=