[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Supporting project review
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Supporting project review |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:30:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
This sounds good.
Maybe you can skip the part about the backup file though.
--
Sylvain
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:17:29PM +0100, Sebastian Gerhardt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is a supporting project review written in the hope that it may ease
> your task a little.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Project name: rand
> https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?8890
>
> Description:
> Intelligible. (OK)
>
> Dependencies:
> Neither proprietary dependencies nor recommendations. (OK)
>
> Licensing:
> The complete project is licensed GPL compatible. (OK)
> A copy of the verbatim license is included. (OK)
>
> Not all non-trivial source files bear an appropriate
> copyright & license notice on the top.
> rand.1 and the makefile lack them. Please fix.
> The rand.c~ presumably is a backup file and misses them, too. It is
> recommended to delete it.
>
> Terms used:
> The rand.c contains a version message saying the program
> is for "Linux", which should be altered to "GNU/Linux"
> because the context suggests this is not only about the kernel.
> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html
>
> (Reviewer's remark: On a brief look, the program seems to be written
> very portable. Therefore, it may be useable on all systems for which
> a standard compliant C compiler exists, not only GNU/Linux)
>
> AUTHORS file:
> The first line seems to refer to an interim project named "bricker".
> This should be changed to the name the project is now released under.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dear [Maintainer's Name],
>
>
> your project "rand", which was submitted to Savannah, has been reviewed.
> A few issues prevent the project from being approved right away.
>
> Attached you will find the protocol of the evaluation. If you
> are still interested in submitting the project, please update
> your project accordingly so we can reconsider the project for
> inclusion in Savannah.
>
> Regards
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Hope this helps
> Sebastian