[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Non GNU projects
From: |
Loic Dachary |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Non GNU projects |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:21:20 +0200 |
Richard Stallman writes:
> All information related to non-gnu projects will be available
> under the domain name freesoftware.fsf.org. You decided for this name
> two month ago.
>
> I had forgotten all about that name. The strange thing is that the
> other people did not remember it either.
I checked the archives. All savannah-hackers were involved + Bradley
Kuhn + Nic Ferrier + Hugo Gayosso and probably others too.
-----
>From address@hidden Mon Mar 26 00:40:57 2001
From: address@hidden (Richard Stallman)
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:40:57 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] Naming our sourceforge clone (was Re:
Savannah and non-GNU software)
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
(address@hidden)
References: <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
freesoftware.fsf.org is the best suggestion I've seen so far.
It gets across the most important points.
-----
I recall that another mail from you stated clearly that freesoftware.fsf.org
should be used but I can't find it. Let's say my memory is bad.
> Can we set it up so that freesoftware.gnu.org does NOT work? In other
> words, are the two domains gnu.org and fsf.org aliases, or do they
> have independent definitions which have been updated in sync until
> now?
It does not work. Only freesoftware.fsf.org works.
> Since non-gnu.fsf.org is so much shorter than freesoftware.fsf.org,
> we might want to support that too.
Ok. We should decide for a cannonical name, though. I'd rather use
non-gnu.fsf.org as a cannonical name since it's shorter. Other names can be
added but for the sake of consistency in naming within savannah I'd rather
like to use only one name.
>
> It sounds like good progress. Which Miguel is this?
> For me, "Miguel" normally means Miguel de Icaza.
> Perhaps we had better stop using first names.
A protugese fellow brought on Board by Jaime Villate.
> What's left to be done ? Technically the mail and the ftp server.
> Other than this I don't see. Could you help me find out ?
>
> It is good news that we are already this close. I hadn't seen
> progress reports since the previous discussion.
True. We did progress reports on address@hidden only. I will
cc: you from now on.
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary http://www.dachary.org/ address@hidden
24 av Secretan http://www.senga.org/ address@hidden
75019 Paris Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16 address@hidden
GPG Public Key: http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt