[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question
From: |
Samuel Tardieu |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:56:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On 15/06, Richard Stallman wrote:
| Because the Savannah software is not packaged and not
| configurable.
|
| Yes, but would it really be hard to move it to one other GNU machine?
| That is not nearly as much work as packaging it and making it
| configurable.
The problem IMO is not the initial installation (you can make a copy of the
disks and remove all the already existing projects), it is the maintenance.
It is hard to have the software evolve the same way on two or more machines
unless it is properly packaged (be it a .tar.gz with everything you need).
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Alessandro Rubini, 2001/06/10
- [Savannah-hackers] Savannah mirrors (was: Licence question), loic, 2001/06/10
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/11
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Loic Dachary, 2001/06/11
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/12
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Loic Dachary, 2001/06/13
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Loic Dachary, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Hugo Gayosso, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question,
Samuel Tardieu <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Loic Dachary, 2001/06/17
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Bernhard Reiter, 2001/06/11
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Licence question, Olivier Berger, 2001/06/16