[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Moving GNATS development to the GNU site
From: |
Milan Zamazal |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Moving GNATS development to the GNU site |
Date: |
14 Nov 2001 10:19:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
>>>>> "JM" == Jason Molenda <address@hidden> writes:
JM> FWIW the move doesn't have to happen down to the millisecond.
JM> The mailing list subscription changes slowly - you could set up
JM> the new list with the subscribers right now and then set up a
JM> redirection at an appointed time. You can tell the handful of
JM> people with gnats cvs write access to not change anything. Same
JM> thing with the gnats bug database.
You're probably right. Jeffrey, could you please send me the lists of
subscribers of all the lists as the first step?
JM> All of the mail archives are availble by rsync. cf
JM> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2001-q4/msg00141.html
JM> The mbox ones are in the ftp site; the mhonarc ones are detailed
JM> in that note.
Thanks for the info.
JM> "BTS" == Bug Tracking System. I've never seen anyone but Milan
JM> use that, so I'm guessing no one else on overseers will
JM> understand. ;-)
The bug tracking system is also used by Yngve and, believe or not :-),
users sometimes report bugs too. So the users need to be stopped for a
while, there is no problem with moving the database itself.
JM> Note to person doing the move - I probably did something
JM> reasonable for the guile list when that moved to gnu.org; you
JM> might want to look at what I did to the config. (it was a year
JM> ago, I have no idea any longer.)
Thanks.
JM> Ah, and leave all the web archives of the mailing lists in place
JM> on sourceware for the forseeable future. The search engines
JM> will have pointers into them, and people looking for gnats stuff
JM> should get directed to a sane place.
Good idea.
JM> No wait, I bet this is one of those European 24-hour things
JM> ("12:00" == noon),
Yes. :-)
JM> so that'd be 4am PST Thursday?
I think so. The idea is that the actions on sources.redhat.com can be
done during Thursday local time, if overseers are not too busy that day.
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
Why waste keystrokes when you can waste CPU cycles instead?
Karl Fogel