Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx development & docs

[E. Weddington]

Klaus Rudolph wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>  
>
> No, we are really not at the point that we should remove simulavr. I think
> we have not enough repsonse from the "world". I dont know how many
> users we have, but actually it is very silent around the simulavr(xx).
> Maybe all is working fine, maybe nobody is using it :-) 
> It is a bit my fault, because I did not anounce it to avrfreak,
> microcontroller.net
> and the most important avr-gcc-list. Maybe I should fire a mail to them. 
>
>  

It also helps to build a release tarball. That way it can be built and 
distributed with WinAVR. That's probably the fastest way to get it 
distributed to the biggest number of AVR users.

I would hope that you're making sure that it's cross-platform. :-)

Eric