outstanding patches was Re: [Simulavr-devel] "Component Version" fields added in trackers

[Joel Sherrill]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Knut Schwichtenberg asked me whether it would be possible to add an
> indication to each tracker item (bugs, patches, support requests)
> whether it is related to the old simulavr code base, or to the new
> simulavrxx one.  After looking at the possible options, I decided the
> pre-configured item "Component Version" would be good enough to use,
> so I added it to all three trackers, and made it mandatory.  I
> modified all open requests, and categorized them -- you've seen all
> the mail traffic about it.
>
>   
Thanks for doing this.  Knut had the right idea.  They needed
to be marked.

Do we need to do some patch triage?   I see a couple I feel
comfortable reviewing but that leaves a number outstanding.

+ [bug #25875] Example stdiodemo not working
+ [Simulavr-devel] [patch #6776] No segfault on access to not 
implemented I/O registers

My working tree also has Michael Moran's patches in it but I
don't know how people feel about me merging them at this point.
I got it all merged and properly autoconf'ed. :)

It is a large patch and it looked to me that he was missing a bit
of the patch that added command line options for the SPI.
But it would be easier for him to complete the patch if 95+% was
merged already.  It builds find and doesn't break anything that
I can tell from the standard examples and tests.  If it does break
something, then we need more tests. :)

--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
address@hidden        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
  Support Available             (256) 722-9985