[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Secure packaging
From: |
David Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Secure packaging |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:58:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5i |
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:52:52PM -0500, Yaron M. Minsky wrote:
> In light of the savannah break-in, and general caution, it seems
> like some kind of package-signing might be in order. Peter
> Palfrader is brought this issue up to me, and it seems like a good
> idea. Do people have any thoughts on the best way to distribute
> signed distributions? How do people normally go about it?
Build the usual tarball, and make a detached signature. End result is
tarball.tar.gz and tarball.tar.gz.sig. Distribute the two together.
David