Re: [Sks-devel] nokeyserver annotation

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

On 12/20/2016 07:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> scenario (a) doesn't matter -- the keyservers simply won't propagate
> that modified cert, which is fine, because it's not actually Alice's
> self-sig anyway.

How wouldn't this matter? If you can trick a user into importing a
package that hinders distribution of the keyblock , and then later on
the user revokes the keyblock and believes it gets uploaded to keyserver
with the modified packet but at that point it is rejected?

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Anything said in Latin sounds profound

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature