[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at t
From: |
Andrew Gallagher |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:44:33 +0000 |
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 19:02, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Figuring out how to do the partial-sync for a limited time sounds
> difficult to me, and i wonder whether it might be better/faster/cheaper
> to just deploy such an update-only network, and don't bother with the
> partial sync.
Parse the syslogs of an old style SKS server, fetch any updated packets, filter
them and submit to the new server. Sync from the old network to the new one
only needs to work in one direction.
A
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Martin Dobrev, 2019/02/06
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Gabor Kiss, 2019/02/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Robert J. Hansen, 2019/02/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Tom at FlowCrypt, 2019/02/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Andrew Gallagher, 2019/02/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2019/02/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2019/02/08
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?,
Andrew Gallagher <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] "SKS is effectively running as end-of-life software at this point"?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2019/02/08