[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] exchange of ideas
|
From: |
brent s. |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] exchange of ideas |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 21:47:56 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 |
On 3/22/19 9:44 PM, brent s. wrote:
(SNIP)
> As you can see, the binary format is approximately 70% the size on-disk
> of the ASCII-armored version. This scales pretty well; generally
> speaking, the binary format of any given signature, including signatures
> or not, regardless of hash type or key size, will be roughly 70% the
> size of the ASCII-armored equivalent data.
(SNIP)
SIGH.
"the binary format of any given signature, including signatures or not,
regardless of hash type or key size,"
should read:
"the binary format of any given *exported key*, including signatures or
not, regardless of hash type or key size,"
--
brent saner
https://square-r00t.net/
GPG info: https://square-r00t.net/gpg-info
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature