Re: [Sks-devel] Keyserver flooding attack: mitigation straw-man

[Bjarni Runar Einarsson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Philihp Busby <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sounds reasonable, but why not just use Hagrid?

I like Hagrid.

But it doesn't solve the same problems. Hagrid (deliberately)
does not support all of the same workflows as the SKS keyserver
pool, nor does Hagrid federate (yet), which is an sticking point
for many.

Also note that I'm talking about what we could do *this week*, to
buy time for the community to decide whether "just use Hagrid"
(maybe with a few new features) is in fact the right course of
action.

Thanks for reading!

 - Bjarni

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEETBSz4pzXkOHlSFMhjgA3FgDPlJEFAl0j2IcACgkQjgA3FgDP
lJHRLgf+JLsKesrKnEFEryKOx7092e5n/Wez1mN73jDT4CkgGqVLUx17bWmhJ6Bz
1rFHEyQ5SAYanVQ+nzm/Qo/2hzBAn0W/BmHT6bKte6tGNB2o28O5epJLd6iaMUyc
RveoYIDVgDCqLP1PAXLTSm/OmHc7NbVNpnZvEDkn63EzhVaPqWlwGO3eIgBkp+vx
ba3MrSEbXh+k1RTwA3mSP7smGApe08/iAHKAnOQHHlXEh4k3zlu30iK4o/CcZ+jg
Cu5DXshsoMN6s26ecpUCpvne4uyG7wuH9gHnJgo/tKPyNegNHxzznYLxFNIHbra4
0c+yYHu3vVhl+Tc2DLmdjrL6iwPOGA==
=2hSf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----