Re: [STUMP] alive and kicking?

[Magnus Henoch]

Rohan Nicholls <address@hidden> writes:

> Is this list and indeed stumpwm still alive?  I have noticed in a post
> that even the developer does not use it, so does anyone?

I currently don't, and haven't for quite some time.  I'd want either
SBCL to run on NetBSD/powerpc (which turned out to be harder than I
thought), or stumpwm to work on clisp (which I haven't tested, and
which would give less type checks).

I have an Arch archive with some hacks.  The URL is
http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~henoch/archive-2004/ (I have a 2005
archive as well, but there is no stumpwm in it).  The branches are
stumpwm--cvs--0 (I was tracking CVS for a while), stumpwm--hack--0
(minor bug fixes, and lots of type declarations), and
stumpwm--netwm--0 (a superset of the hack branch, trying to get
stumpwm to comply with Freedesktop's window manager specification.  I
got it to display a panel at the bottom of the screen).

Magnus