Re: [STUMP] interactive command in symbol plist

[Shawn Betts]

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Howard Yeh <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>  I am a new stumpwm user (welcome me! ; )
>
>  Just reading through the code. I am wondering if there's any special
>  reason why commands are saved in a global hash rather than in the
>  symbol plist?
>
>  To define a command, we could associate the interactive arguments as a
>  symbol property. To check if a function is a command, we just check if
>  the symbol has the "interactive" property in its plist.

How would you do tab completion?

-Shawn