[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu soc status
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: gnu soc status |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:47:51 -0500 |
I am less than ecstatic about the proposal as it now stands -
basically, he just rehashes the project description.
I left some comments there.
Thanks much for looking.
Given that we have to drop one more proposal to get to our slot count, I
guess this is the one. All the others above it were stronger, looked like.
If anyone thinks that their "approved" proposal has a significant chance
of failure, please let me know. Otherwise (modulo the specific Hurd
proposal and/or students choosing a different project), the top 8
proposals in the listing are the ones that are in:
gnowsys, coreutils, libjit, gdb/mi, guile/elisp, screen, smalltalk, hurd.
Let me know if questions/problems/vociferous complaints :).
karl
- Re: gnu soc status, (continued)
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: gnu soc status, Micah Cowan, 2009/04/10
- my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Tom Tromey, 2009/04/11
- Re: gnu soc status, Sam Steingold, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: gnu soc status, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, phcoder, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Bean, 2009/04/15