Rick Riolo wrote:
as i recall that is how we did it for the swarmfest that was at um,
i.e., submissions were to the swarmfest-X list and so all
the people on the board saw it. i think we had people volunteer
to do several papers each and we made sure we had at least
2 readers of each paper.
we can set up a separate list here at um, or we could
just open the swarmfest-2006 list for that.
Right now, anyone can send to swarmfest-2006 and I (or you, Rick)
have to let it through. There's been a fairly steady stream of spam
so I'm happy to keep filtering.
In fact, the call for papers tells people to send submissions to
swarmfest-2006, so we can't change that.
How about if I accumulate the submittals, and as we get closer I
can distribute them for review?
Greg: We should revise the Call for papers to talk about abstract
approval. I forgot that some people cannot get travel funding
unless their abstract is approved. Could you add something like
this to the end of the paragraph that starts "Two kinds of
presentation...":
"In the past we have been able to accommodate most requests to
present. Official acceptance decisions will be made the first week
of June. If you need an earlier decision, for example to secure
travel funds, please say so in your submittal."
Steve
--
Lang Railsback & Assoc.
250 California Ave.
Arcata, California 95521
(707) 822-0453
_______________________________________________
Swarmfest2006 mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.swarm.org/mailman/listinfo/swarmfest2006