[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken
From: |
Sebastian Heinlein |
Subject: |
Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:10:50 +0100 |
Am Mo, den 12.01.2004 schrieb Richard Bos um 20:31:
> A question about terminology, I'm forwarding the question:
> I agree with the questioner that in my case too, the packages are not
> obsolete
> at all, they are just installed without being part of a repository! I think
> that the term obsolete is not correct.
Perhaps we should replace "obsolete" with "not available".
[Sorry for the private message to all translators]
- [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Richard Bos, 2004/01/12
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken,
Sebastian Heinlein <=
- Bug - Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Sebastian Heinlein, 2004/01/13
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Michael Vogt, 2004/01/13
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Richard Bos, 2004/01/13
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Panu Matilainen, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, radoeka, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Sebastian Heinlein, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Richard Bos, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Michael Vogt, 2004/01/19
- Re: [Synaptic-devel] obsolete and locally installed, seems mistaken, Sebastian Heinlein, 2004/01/20