[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] Electronic Money Issuer in the EU
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] Electronic Money Issuer in the EU |
|
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:51:31 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
I don't see a problem with the WTR, as clause (14) specifically says
Member States should except "domestic low-value transfers (...) used fo
rthe purchase of goods or services". So as I don't think of using GNU
Taler for buying a car, house or a company, and as we can impose limits
on withdrawal, the WTR simply should not apply (by some reading,
depending on individual member-states interpretation, etc. etc., IANAL).
On 10/31/2015 02:22 AM, Andreas Ruf wrote:
>
> Has anybody looked at these so far? In particular, I am currently
> looking at the Wire Transfer Regulation and am scratching my head how
> the anonymity of the payer that we are all looking to implement could
> work under this regulation. Any ideas or experiences?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature