[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Taler] Blind signature decision
From: |
Raphael Arias |
Subject: |
[Taler] Blind signature decision |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:06:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi list,
I know there was some discussion in the beginning on whether to use an
ECC blind signature scheme and a few of them were ruled out because of
vulnerabilities in the protocols or other reasons. Which is why Taler
stayed with RSA blind sigs.
I was wondering if there exists documentation about the specific flaws
and reasons that led to this decision somewhere out there.
Thanks in advance,
Raphael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=alNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Taler] Blind signature decision,
Raphael Arias <=