[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] Moral rights: credits
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] Moral rights: credits |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:57:38 +0000 |
Fabian Kirsch transcribed 780 bytes:
>
> > Maybe. I don't know whether it matters in court whether there are a small
> > or a large number of other contributors, other than the one who is sueing.
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> Do we agree that:
>
> 1.) all relevant info (for us) is already in the commit messages
>
> 2.) the tags in the source files primarily serve legal purposes (and not
> kudos)
>
> If so:
>
> Let's autogenerate the tags by a script which relies on "git blame" or "git
> annotate".
> Parameters for the selection of authors to be displayed can than
> be tuned by those which like to perform "legal thinking" in their free time.
If we want this, I can extend a script I had to write this year.
git blame and git annotate alone won't get you anywhere, I really
want "git name-authors" or something like that.
Personally I'd also give more context to the tags itself (if possible, can't
remember right now), or think about a more generic approach what to add in
addition
to a name.
In SPDX 2.1 spec you have this:
https://spdx.org/spdx-specification-21-web-version#h.sqyw64
which as spdx does, serves a different purpose than doxygen.
given how spdx is used, it might have more weight at least
from those who analyze these files.
> I don't want to participate in discussion what amount of lines makes an
> author relevant.
> Yet i see value in such tings to be handled consistently across codebase.
>
>
> greetings
>
> Fabian
>
>
Re: [Taler] [GNUnet-developers] Moral rights: credits, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/10/07