[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] note to 035-regional-currencies.rst
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] note to 035-regional-currencies.rst |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:12:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 |
On 2/12/23 14:13, Calvin Burns via Taler wrote:
Just some thoughts about local currencies.
An exchange could also connect two regional currencies.
The "cash-out" function would translate currency 1 to currency 2 somehow.
We actually think that in general currency conversion should likely be
the role of a merchant, where you purchase one currency and pay with
another one. The regional currency 'cash-out' functionality by libeufin
is a bit of a special case, as this is handling the case where no
exchange is available for the fiat currency.
Today every commercial bank creates it's own local currency by printing its own
money (by creating credit (for itself or others) and take "interest" for
creating credit).
How do they connect their local currencies (beside giving them the same name)?
That's different, as here it (usually) doesn't matter which commercial
bank your money is with, especially given asset insurance and a
reasonable regulatory framework. So if that exists, we'd show all of
those commercially backed coins of the same denomination to be
equivalent ("no scope") based on them sharing the same auditor(s).
However, in cases where the specific issuer does matter, we can apply
the same rule as for regional currencies and show the domain name of the
(backing) issuer with the national currency.
At least, that's my interpretation of the current state of the design
discussion ;-)
Happy hacking!
-Christian