[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: address@hidden: Re: texinfo to docbook conversion -
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: address@hidden: Re: texinfo to docbook conversion - @r{} is not <lineannotation>]] |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 22:14:18 GMT |
Patrice - see Arnold's reply below. I'm fine with @r being a no-op in
Docbook if you are. (BTW, Arnold is not subscribed to any texinfo list,
so please keep him in cc when replying. Sorry if I messed that up this
time.)
Thanks,
karl
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:35:29 +0200
From: Aharon Robbins <address@hidden>
[...]
karl> What do you prefer?
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:33:58 +0100
> From: Patrice Dumas <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: texinfo to docbook conversion - @r{} is not <lineannotation>
>
> So, what do we do? I see 3 possibilities
> * keep things as is
> * use <lineannotation> only in preformatted environements (@example...),
> no element otherwise
> * never use <lineannotation>, @r becomes a no-op in DocBook.
>
> What looks best?
Of the three, having @r be a no-op is the best choice. I would
like to see lineannotation in the language but I can live without it.
Thanks,
Arnold
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden: Re: address@hidden: Re: texinfo to docbook conversion - @r{} is not <lineannotation>]],
Karl Berry <=