RE: [Tinycc-devel] License

[TK]

Fabrice,

I would favor the LGPL as well.

TK

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Fabrice Bellard
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:57 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] License

Hi,

Maybe it would be simpler to just use the internal stack based code 
generation API of tcc.

About the licensing, I would be ready to change the license provided 
good contributions are made to TinyCC. LGPL would be perfect for me.

Fabrice.

brian wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have been looking at tinycc for dynamic code generation, and am 
> considering adding an AST front-end, which would make this easier.
> Unfortunately we build a distributable commercial product, and cannot 
> use code with the GPL license in it.
> 
> Either the LGPL or X11 license would suit, and naturally, under either

> circumstance, any modifications or code particular to tinycc would be 
> returned to the community.
> 
> Are there any active movements in this direction, and if so, what kind

> of timeline do you see on such a relicencing?
> 
> Regards,,
> 
> Brian




_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel