[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast)
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast) |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2007 18:22:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:36 pm, Dave Dodge wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:36:20PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 11 May 2007 3:01 pm, Dave Dodge wrote:
> > > Aside: from a purely C standpoint the memcpy() solution isn't actually
> > > guaranteed to work either, thanks to C99's concept of padding bits.
> >
> > What are "padding bits"?
[cut explanation of padding bits]
Ok, now I'm SURE I don't care. :)
Rob
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), kf, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), David A. Wheeler, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Gil Dabah, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), kf, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Gil Dabah, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), David A. Wheeler, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast),
Rob Landley <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/11
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/11