Re: [Tinycc-devel] Today's bug...

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 06 September 2007 5:59:15 am Joshua Phillips wrote:
> Why can't we set __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG, since we do indeed have
> support for long longs?

Because I don't want to hardwire a macro with the string "GLIBC" into tcc?  
(I've used it against uClibc before, it doesn't depend on a specific C 
library...)

It seems that the right thing to do is set __STDC_VERSION__ to show we have 
c99, which I did, although now includes of regex.h are barfing.  This might 
be a glibc bug, or might be that we need to understand "restrict", I'll play 
with it in the morning...

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.