[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures
From: |
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:10:19 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:54:16PM +0200, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> Even if you really need a trampoline, you don't need a fancy compiler for
> that. It's easy to implement (at least on i386) using the existing support
> for attribute(regparm). Real closures in C- way more fun than gcc's nested
> functions, which are quite limited and (rightfully, IMO) seldom used.
Except that what your example program does is not a real closure. You
*do* need compiler support for them.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, (continued)
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Rob Landley, 2007/09/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2007/09/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Peter Lund, 2007/09/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Zdenek Pavlas, 2007/09/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Zdenek Pavlas, 2007/09/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2007/09/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Zdenek Pavlas, 2007/09/12
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Rob Landley, 2007/09/12
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Rob Landley, 2007/09/11
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2007/09/12
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Rob Landley, 2007/09/12
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2007/09/13
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Zdenek Pavlas, 2007/09/13
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Local procedures, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2007/09/13