Re: [Tinycc-devel] the most useless question on this list about basic c++ extensions

[pancake]

On 05/09/10 23:08, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> On Saturday 08 May 2010 17:05:32 mobi phil wrote:
>    
> > Hello,
> >
> > the most useless question on this list:
> > did anybody think about adding basic C++ extensions to tcc, eventually
> > trivial form of templates?
> >      
> tcc misses at least one thing for C++: exception handling. I plan to implement
> it but I won't start the implementation before mid june so don't be too in a
> hurry. :) And of course the C++ parsing must be added. As some some rules are
> different than in C (like priority of operators), this might require some
> (maybe minor) refactoring. Also, the calling convention is different so there
> is work to do in the symbols generation as well. That's for what I know, I may
> have forgotten things.
>
> Regards.
>    
C++ is a very different weird and hardly complex language compared to C.

Are you saying that TCC will support it? In mainstream? As an extension?

I would really prefer to not have such support..and in case, just think on
object-oriented extensions, but not c++.

--pancake