[Tinycc-devel] Re: Tinycc-devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 16

[Henry Kroll]

> Basile,
> 
> Do you have any thoughts about implementing a minimalistic C++ extension
> to TinyCC, specifically that includes only the class, public/ protected/
> private, inheritance, member functions (virtual or no), and that's
> basically it?
> 
> The idea would be the encapsulation of the base C++ design, but without
> all the bloat, the ability to create a quick application that would
> compile under any C++ compiler, but using only these features.
> 
> Any thoughts?  And I realize you may be busy right now.  Please respond
> when you can.  Thanks!
> 
> - Rick C. Hodgin
> 

That would be an interesting extension or wrapper.

I would be happy enough with c99 compliance, to wit VLA's.