Re: [Tinycc-devel] can't build mob branch on x86 64

[Thomas Preud'homme]

Le samedi 05 février 2011 19:33:10, grischka a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >>> I guess I just mean that the fact you missed the "TOK_alloca is an
> >>> enum" bit plus a few other simple things makes me worry about how well
> >>> tested the *complicated* stuff is and I'd kinda like to see you pull
> >>> it back, sleep on it, think on it, polish it a little bit and then
> >>> bring it back.  I went through the same kind of thing with my patch
> >>> for weak symbols - I had to throw it out and start over and ended up
> >>> with a much smaller, much better version.
> > 
> > By the way, I reverted the changes but I don't know when I will not have
> > much time to work on VLA in the next weeks.
> 
> Do you guys want some extra branch(es) at repo.or.cz for more relaxed work,
> to compare your approaches, etc...?
Well, I'm not sure, it depends on Joe Soroka. Actually I have my own server 
with a gitolite installation. I can create account as well, I just need a 
public ssh key and username (actually the file public key just need to be 
formated as address@hidden). But the work would have more visibility (hence 
more testing hopefully) on repo.or.cz. Joe, what do you think?

I will try to provide as soon as possible a version which handle bound check 
and don't use VLA if they aren't available (should be straightforward with a 
CONFIG_TCC_ALLOCA defined or not in Makefile). As to a negative size for VLA, 
I'm not sure of what the correct behaviour should be. Should we just do 
nothing, take the opposite of the value, or something else?
> 
> If so just ask (and tell your repo.or.cz username).
Waiting for the preferences of Joe. Thanks for proposing by the way.
> 
> --- grischka
> 
> > [SNIP]
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Thomas Preud'homme

Best regards,

Thomas Preud'homme

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.