Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

[Thomas Preud'homme]

Le jeudi 31 janvier 2013 12:34:27, Stephan Beal a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Preud'homme 
<address@hidden>wrote:
> > > -                strcpy(buf, "__bound_");
> > > -                strcat(buf, name);
> > > +                snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "__bound_%s", name);
> 
> strcpy and strcat are C89 and C99 while snprintf is only C99.
> 
> 
> The semantics of the above variants are not the same, are they? strcpy()
> and strcat() are both writing to the same address in buf, i.e. strcat is
> overwriting what strcpy() copied into buf. So the end result, unless i'm
> sorely mistaken, is a copy of the name with the __bound_ prefix. strncat()
> is c89, BTW.

strcat copy the second argument at the end of the string pointed at by the 
first argument.

So after strcpy you'll have __bound_ and then the strcat will add name at the 
end of this string.

Did I misunderstand what you said?

Best regards,

Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.